Self-Service Is Not a Strategy (Research Is)

In late 2025, that “Top 10 Business Nightmares of 2026” post hit a nerve, especially around how fast buyers are changing and how slowly systems are keeping up. This is second in that series, and it digs into one of the biggest pain points executives named: buyers demanding self-service experiences that most companies simply aren’t built to deliver.

Buyers have changed faster than most companies’ systems—and faster than most companies’ understanding of those buyers.

McKinsey’s 2024 B2B Pulse research shows that decision-makers now expect to research, evaluate, and transact on their own terms, often preferring digital and self-service options over traditional sales interactions.

Amazon and AI have only speed up this evolution.

At the same time, analysts are waving red flags that many brands will damage customer trust by rolling out clumsy, AI-heavy self-service that solves internal cost problems but not real customer needs.

That gap between expectation and execution is not a UX problem; it is a research problem.!

Buyers Want Control, Not a Gatekeeper

Your customers walk into every interaction with Amazon and Uber as their baseline. They expect transparency, speed, and the ability to “just do it themselves” without asking permission.

Research from the likes McKinsey and Intelligentics show that a large share of B2B decision-makers now prefer to reorder online rather than call a rep, and are increasingly comfortable placing bigger orders through digital channels.

But what they want is control...not abandonment at an AI wall.

Your customers want the tools and information to move fast when the risk feels low. They also want the confidence that help is one click (and less than a 5 mintue wait) away when it doesn’t.

Without research, most companies guess what that control looks like. They think buyers want a portal, a chatbot, or a new app and then measure success based on adoption metrics and not behavior and satisfaction.

Serious buyer research reveals a different story: what buyers actually want varies by segment, deal size, risk profile, and even internal politics. You will only truly know by listening and observing. And only then can you design self-service that feels like empowerment, not avoidance.

The Hidden Complexity Under “Self-Service”

I often hear leaders say, “Let’s just make it self-service,” as if that were a simple switch. In B2B, it rarely is. True self-service has to handle negotiated pricing, contract terms, complex configurations, multi-site account structures, approvals, and post-sale service. And it has to all this without shunting customers back into email the moment things get complicated.

Most legacy systems were engineered around internal workflows and reps, not around a buyer logging in at midnight to configure and purchase on their own.

This is where research earns its keep. Journey mapping, task analysis, and in-depth interviews expose where customers actually hit friction: which steps they can navigate confidently, which rules and exceptions confuse them, and which policies are relics of internal convenience rather than external value.

Instead of copying your offline process into a digital form, research helps you redesign the process around how customers think, decide, and work in the real world.

You’re Probably Building for the Wrong Journey

Modern buying journeys are nonlinear, collaborative, and messy. Studies consistently show that buyers do most of their learning and consensus-building before they ever talk to sales, stitching together vendor content, peer input, and internal debates.

Yet many “self-service” experiences are optimized for simple repeat orders, not for the early-stage discovery, comparison, and risk-reduction work that actually drives decisions.

Good research doesn’t just ask, “Do you want a portal?”

It asks and answers harder questions:

• How do different stakeholders inside the account actually progress from problem to solution?

• Where do they feel overconfident and where do they feel exposed?

• What information, tools, and reassurance do they seek at each step—and through which channels?

When you know that, you stop building digital replicas of your org chart and start building an ecosystem of content, tools, and touchpoints that mirrors the real journey.

The “Until It Breaks” Moment

Customers want self-service—until they don’t. McKinsey’s work on hybrid sales makes this clear: the strongest performers blend self-service, remote, and in-person channels, and allow customers to fluidly switch between them as complexity and stakes rise. Forrester’s forecasts underline the danger of ignoring this nuance: a significant share of brands will erode trust by forcing customers through rigid AI- or bot-driven experiences that cannot handle exceptions, emotion, or urgency.

Only research can tell you where that line is for your buyers. Where does “DIY” feel liberating, and where does it feel like abandonment? Which moments in the journey absolutely require a human, and what kind of human—specialist, rep, success manager, technical expert? Without that clarity, you end up over-automating sensitive moments and under-supporting the ones that really move revenue and loyalty.

The Question That Changes Everything

So here is the question every leadership team should be wrestling with...

Do you actually know which parts of your buying process customers want to do themselves and which parts they want a human to guide them through?

That answer doesn’t live in a dashboard.

It lives in disciplined, ongoing consumer and buyer research: surveys that quantify preferences, interviews that surface emotion and context, journey studies that reveal where digital shines and where it fails.

When you have that evidence, “self-service” stops being a buzzword and becomes a precise design choice, tailored by segment, scenario, and stage.

That is the work Intelligentics does every day.

By specializing in consumer and buyer research, Intelligentics helps organizations see their buying experience the way customers actually live it, pinpointing where self-service creates value, where it creates risk, and where a human safety net turns a transaction into a relationship.

‍